2024MAY10: Our hosting provider is experiencing intermittent networking issues. We apologize for any inconvenience.
  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

Create new odc-sci Account and/or to download the file.


An online survey about the top priorities for recovery and interest in Spinal Cord Stimulation for people living with SCI (Spinal Cord Injury)


DOI:10.34945/F53889


DATASET CITATION

Thorogood N., Waheed Z., Chernesky J., Burkhart I., Smith J., Sweeney S., Wudlick R., Douglas S., Wang D., Noonan V. (2023) An online survey about the top priorities for recovery and interest in Spinal Cord Stimulation for people living with SCI (Spinal Cord Injury). Open Data Commons for Spinal Cord Injury. ODC-SCI:853 http://doi.org/10.34945/F53889


ABSTRACT

STUDY PURPOSE: To obtain opinions from people living with SCI (Spinal Cord Injury) on the desired outcomes and perceived potential risks of SCS (Spinal Cord Stimulation).

DATA COLLECTED: 223 respondents living with SCI completed the survey. The majority of respondents were male (64%), were 10+ years post-SCI (63%), lived in the United States or Canada (90%) and had a mean age of 50.8 years. Most individuals had a traumatic SCI (81%) and 45% classified themselves as having tetraplegia. The top five desired outcomes of SCS include performing bowel and bladder care; less reliance on caregivers; maintaining physical health; mobility outside of the home and ability to travel. Perceived potential risks include further loss of function; increased neuropathic pain; requiring additional surgery from complications; skin breakdown over the implant; and infection requiring antibiotics. Barriers to participation in SCS clinical trials include inability to relocate, out-of-pocket expenses and awareness of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS: SCS clinical trial design, participant recruitment and translation of the technology can be improved by better understanding the desired outcomes and perceived potential risks for those living with SCI identified from this study.


KEYWORDS

Spinal Cord Injury; Spinal Cord Stimulation; Community Survey; Clinical Trial Design; Risk Tolerance; Community Perspectives; Clinical Research


PROVENANCE / ORIGINATING PUBLICATIONS

RELEVANT LINKS


NOTES

Year of birth and free text responses were removed; and year of injury was modified for deidentification purposes.

DATASET INFO

Contact: Noonan Vanessa (vnoonan@praxisinstitute.org)


Lab: Praxis Spinal Cord Institute

ODC-SCI Accession:853

Records in Dataset: 231

Fields per Record: 152

Last updated: 2023-05-05

Date published: 2023-05-05

Downloads: 12


Files: 2


LICENSE

Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0)


FUNDING AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Praxis Spinal Cord Institute , Western Economic Diversification Canada


CONTRIBUTORS

Thorogood, Nancy
Praxis Spinal Cord Institute
Waheed, Zeina
Praxis Spinal Cord Institute
Chernesky, John
Praxis Spinal Cord Institute
Burkhart, Ian
North American Spinal Cord Injury Consortium
Smith, Judith
North American Spinal Cord Injury Consortium
Sweeney, Shannon
North American Spinal Cord Injury Consortium
Wudlick, Rob
North American Spinal Cord Injury Consortium and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota
Douglas, Sam
Praxis Spinal Cord Institute
Wang, Di
Praxis Spinal Cord Institute
Noonan, Vanessa
Praxis Spinal Cord Institute